stlasas.blogg.se

1. Aquamacs vs emacs mac os#
2. Aquamacs vs emacs install#
3. Aquamacs vs emacs full#
4. Aquamacs vs emacs download#

With Emacs you can say you want to put the reference of an equation and it will present a list of all equation (you can read the label and the equation itself) from which you chose which equation to reference. This is pretty simple: unfortunately if you have a long Word document, you have to manually find the equation you want to reference, and this is not quick. You can create a numbered equation, then say you want a reference to an equation and double click the equation number. Using references with MathType and Word is not difficult.

In fact I have never seen Emacs crashing in my whole life. On the other side Latex and Emacs never crashed. I find overly annoyinh to redo the same job twice. Unfortunately crashes anger me a lot, and I tend not to be able to continue working. The first thing you do is close Word and reopen it. This is not usually a problem: the rest of the document is not touched (and Word itself does not hang) and you lose only the last minutes of work. MathType tends to crash in unexpected ways. The main problem I found with Word + MathType were errors. We are now comparing Latex and Word on Word’s own field: small simple documents.

We already know that Latex is more powerfull than word.

Aquamacs vs emacs full#

While Word is a wordprocessor meant to write and quickly format texts (this is not perfecly true, since Word includes some functions that are part of a publishing software), Latex is a full environment meant to produce documents ready to be published. So this is not a test intended to prove that latex is more powerfull. MathType was able to handle the equations: for example some equations used in computer science are really hard to express with MathType.

Aquamacs vs emacs install#

Other Emacs installations already include it (and if you use GNU/Linux or FreeBSD it should be easy to install the package). This is the case with Aquamacs, which comes with Auctex bundled. Please notice than when I speak about Emacs, I assume Auctex is configured and working. If you are a novice, you may want to try TextMate or BBEdit instead, or maybe TexShop (search google for them ☺). Aquamacs is itself almost configured: of course to use its extended capabilities you should already know Emacs. You can read my last two posts about Aquamacs w/th Latex and Texniscope. Their subject and structure was similar, so I decided to compare Latex + Emacs and Word + MathType.Įmacs was Aquamacs, standard version, configured to work with Texniscope. when contributing to the NS port of Emacs.Recently I had to write two simple scientific documents. You want a "reference" implementation of Emacs, e.g.You are accustomed to X11 and want the exact same look and feel when using Emacs on macOS.You want a feature only available in the X11 port, like support for xwidget.Generally, I would not recommend using the X11 port as you wont get macOS look and feel, however in some situations it might be of interest: Overall, they are fairly similar but provides a slightly different feature set. If you want to spend some time on getting the best Emacs for you, try both the official Emacs and the "mac" port.

Aquamacs vs emacs download#

If you are lazy, pick the official Emacs - you can download a prebuilt version from. This gives you an Emacs that only can run in a terminal window, much like a GUI Emacs behaves when passed the -nw option. In fact, this is not one GUI but a family of GUI:s as it's possible to build using different X11 support libraries like GTK+. Unfortunately, the end result will not have macOS look and feel - things like menus looks as though you were running on a unix-like system. X11: It is possible to build Emacs with the same GUI as used on X11 system, however it requires a X11 server to run. (This port is also referred to as the "railway cat" Emacs, as this is where the brew recipe is hosted.)Īquamacs is based on the NS port of Emacs and contains a number of enhancements making it behave more like traditional macOS applications.

Aquamacs vs emacs mac os#

This originates from the Emacs port to Mac OS 8/9 and the "Carbon" port of Emacs 22. It provides an alternative GUI with a different feature set compared to the NS port. Mitsuharu Yamamoto-san maintains the "Mac port" of Emacs. As the name suggests, this port of Emacs originates in Emacs for the NextSTEP operating system and has been the official Emacs GUI on macOS since Emacs 23. The official Emacs on macOS is build using the "NS" port, also known as the "cocoa" port. There are a number of Emacs versions for macOS, including: